What you may have heard
Priesthood authority was restored
God's priesthood authority was lost from the earth after the apostles died. John the Baptist restored the Aaronic Priesthood and Peter, James, and John restored the Melchizedek Priesthood to Joseph Smith, so ordinances are valid before God only when performed by that authority.
What the evidence shows
You are right that the Bible takes authority seriously: no one should take the honor of priesthood on himself. But Hebrews, the New Testament’s book about priesthood, says the Aaronic priesthood belonged to a covenant that was passing away, and that Jesus holds his Melchizedek priesthood forever, without successors, because he never dies. The New Testament never calls a church office a priesthood, and it gives every believer direct access to God through Christ.
On this page
- Why it seems true
- Hebrews 5:4 is about the high priest, and it points to Christ
- Hebrews says the Aaronic priesthood belonged to a covenant that was passing away
- Christ's priesthood does not pass to successors
- In the New Testament, every believer is a priest, and no church office is a priesthood
- The Bible tests every claim to act for God by its message
- Questions you might still have
- Where this leaves us
- Check the sources
Why it seems true
A marriage is legal because an authorized officer performs it, and a baptism, it seems, should be no different. The Bible appears to agree: “no man taketh this honour unto himself, but he that is called of God, as was Aaron” (Hebrews 5:4). Jesus gave his apostles power (Matthew 10:1) and gave Peter “the keys of the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 16:19). When the sons of Sceva tried to use Jesus’ name without authority, the evil spirit answered, “Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye?” (Acts 19:15). The fifth Article of Faith states it plainly: a man “must be called of God, by prophecy, and by the laying on of hands by those who are in authority.” Joseph Smith-History tells how John the Baptist conferred the Priesthood of Aaron on Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery on May 15, 1829, and the Doctrine and Covenants tells of Peter, James, and John conferring the higher priesthood. If authority was lost, it had to be restored.
Authority and calling are real in the Bible, and the early church had appointed leaders. The apostles laid hands on the seven (Acts 6:6), and Paul told Titus to “ordain elders in every city” (Titus 1:5). Christians outside the Church ordain ministers too, and they would agree that no one should appoint himself. Hebrews does speak of a priesthood “after the order of Melchisedec,” and it is the Bible’s longest discussion of priesthood. So order and calling matter. The dispute is over whether the New Testament teaches that saving ordinances depend on a priesthood office that could be lost and had to be restored.
Hebrews 5:4 is about the high priest, and it points to Christ
Hebrews 5 begins, “every high priest taken from among men is ordained for men in things pertaining to God, that he may offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins” (5:1). The “honour” in verse 4 is the honor of being high priest, and Aaron is the example.
Then the writer says who holds that honor now: “So also Christ glorified not himself to be made an high priest; but he that said unto him, Thou art my Son … Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec” (5:5-6).
The verse is not a rule about how men in the church receive priesthood. It sets up the writer’s argument that Jesus was called by God, as Aaron was, to be the high priest of a new covenant. Chapters 5 through 10 develop that argument, and they are the best place in the Bible to learn what priesthood looks like after Christ.
Hebrews says the Aaronic priesthood belonged to a covenant that was passing away
“If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood … what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law” (Hebrews 7:11-12).
The writer points out that Jesus came from the tribe of Judah, “of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood” (7:14). Under the law of Moses, priesthood belonged to the descendants of Aaron in the tribe of Levi. Jesus is a priest of a different order, under a different covenant. Of the old covenant, Hebrews says: “In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away” (8:13).
Doctrine and Covenants 13 says that the Priesthood of Aaron “shall never be taken again from the earth, until the sons of Levi do offer again an offering unto the Lord in righteousness.” Hebrews describes that priesthood differently: as the priesthood of a covenant that was ready to vanish, replaced by the priesthood of Christ. Its priests “offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins” gave way to one who “offered one sacrifice for sins for ever” (10:11-12).
Christ's priesthood does not pass to successors
Hebrews explains why the old priesthood needed a line of successors and the new one does not. “And they truly were many priests, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death: But this man, because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable priesthood. Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them” (Hebrews 7:23-25). The Berean Standard Bible renders verse 24, “But because Jesus lives forever, He has a permanent priesthood.”
Priests had successors because priests died. Jesus does not die, so his priesthood does not pass to anyone. He holds it himself, forever, and he is able to save completely everyone who comes to God through him.
Hebrews never says that the Melchizedek priesthood was given to the apostles, to elders, or to anyone besides Jesus. In the whole letter, only two people hold it: Melchizedek, as a picture, and Christ, as the reality. If no one else ever held it, it could not be lost from the earth or need restoring, because its only holder “ever liveth.”
Two priesthoods in Hebrews
Hebrews 7 to 10 sets the priests of the law of Moses beside Christ, and gives the reason one needed successors and the other does not.
The priests of Aaron's line
Many priests from one tribe, each replaced at death, offering the same sacrifices again and again (Hebrews 7:23; 10:11).
The question it raises
Why did this priesthood need a line of successors?
Jesus, after the order of Melchizedek
One priest who continues forever, who offered himself once for all, and who always lives to intercede (Hebrews 7:24-27).
The question it raises
Who would need to succeed a priest who never dies?
Succession was needed because priests died. Christ lives forever, so his priesthood does not pass to another.
In the New Testament, every believer is a priest, and no church office is a priesthood
The New Testament names many leaders in the church: apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, teachers, elders, bishops (overseers), and deacons. It never calls any of them priests. Apart from the priests of the Jerusalem temple, the New Testament uses the word “priest” for only two kinds of people in the new covenant: Jesus, the high priest, and all believers together.
Peter writes to ordinary Christians, men and women, slave and free: “Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood” and “ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood” (1 Peter 2:5, 9). John says Christ “hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father” (Revelation 1:6).
That affects how you approach God. Hebrews says, “Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh; And having an high priest over the house of God; Let us draw near” (Hebrews 10:19-22). Paul writes, “there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5). Jesus has already opened the way into God’s presence.
The Bible tests every claim to act for God by its message
Paul’s test for any messenger includes himself: “though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed” (Galatians 1:8). Authority did not exempt even an apostle. When Peter acted against the gospel at Antioch, Paul says, “I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed” (Galatians 2:11).
Joseph Smith-History says that the priesthood was conferred by “a messenger from heaven” who said “his name was John” (1:68, 72). The Bible asks you to judge that account by the message it brings, not by how sincerely Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery told it. Doctrine and Covenants 84:21-22 says that “without the ordinances thereof, and the authority of the priesthood, the power of godliness is not manifest unto men in the flesh; For without this no man can see the face of God, even the Father, and live.” Hebrews says that access to God comes through Christ’s own blood and his permanent priesthood, and it invites every believer to “come boldly unto the throne of grace” (Hebrews 4:16). Read more in a great apostasy made restoration necessary.
Upon you my fellow servants, in the name of Messiah I confer the Priesthood of Aaron, which holds the keys of the ministering of angels, and of the gospel of repentance, and of baptism by immersion for the remission of sins
Questions you might still have
What about the keys Jesus gave Peter?
Jesus told Peter, “I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven” (Matthew 16:19). Two chapters later he gives the same power to bind and loose to all the disciples (18:18), in the setting of forgiveness and church discipline. In Acts, Peter opens the door of the kingdom by preaching, first to Jews at Pentecost (Acts 2) and then to Gentiles in Cornelius’s house (Acts 10). The New Testament does not describe the keys being passed down, lost, or restored. It shows them used to open the kingdom through the gospel.
Doesn't the story of the sons of Sceva show that authority matters?
It shows that the name of Jesus is not a magic formula. The sons of Sceva were not believers. They were “vagabond Jews, exorcists,” using the phrase “by Jesus whom Paul preacheth” (Acts 19:13). The spirit knew Jesus and knew Paul, but did not know them. What they lacked was not a priesthood office; they did not belong to Jesus. Acts never mentions Paul holding a priesthood; it shows him belonging to Christ and preaching his gospel.
If the priesthood was not restored, are my baptism and other ordinances meaningless?
The New Testament ties baptism to Jesus’ command and to faith in him: “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:19). Its power comes from Christ, not from the office of the one who performs it. Your faith in Jesus and your wish to obey him are real. That leaves one question: whether your standing before God rests on a priesthood restored in 1829, or on Christ, who “ever liveth to make intercession” for you.
Then who may baptize or lead a church?
The New Testament expects churches to have recognized leaders, called and appointed with care: elders and deacons who meet the qualifications Paul lists (1 Timothy 3; Titus 1:5-9). Christians differ on the details of church order, and order does matter. What the New Testament does not teach is that a line of priesthood authority makes ordinances valid, could disappear from the earth, and had to be restored by angels. Leaders serve the church; Christ alone is its high priest.
Where this leaves us
The Bible takes authority seriously, and Hebrews 5:4 is a real verse about calling. Read in its chapter, it points to Christ, called by God as high priest forever. Hebrews says the Aaronic priesthood belonged to a covenant that was passing away, and that Christ holds his priesthood permanently, without successors, because he never dies. The New Testament never makes a church office a priesthood; it calls all believers priests and gives them access to God through Jesus. Church order and the events of 1829 raise questions this page leaves open. One remains: if Christ “continueth ever” as your high priest, what could anyone restore that he does not already hold?
Keep reading
- Public revelation and prophetic testsThe Torah and the apostles give public tests for anyone who claims to speak for God: agreement with earlier revelation, loyalty to the one God, and predictions that come true.
- The apostolic gospel is finalPaul and Jude describe the apostles' message as a trust to guard. So any later revelation can be tested by one question: does it preach the same gospel?
- A great apostasy made restoration necessaryThe New Testament warns of apostasy but promises the gospel will endure, and the apostles' message was preached without a break from the first century on.
- Families can be together forever through temple sealingThe Bible shares the hope of reunion with those we love, grounds it in Christ by grace, and records Jesus saying resurrection life goes beyond marriage.
- The Book of Mormon is another testament of Jesus ChristAn inward witness cannot settle whether a book is scripture. The Bible's test is whether a message matches the apostles' gospel, even when an angel brings it.
Check the sources
This page relies on these sources. Each has its own page with the full citation and, where one exists, a link to the original.