What you may have heard
Jesus was a Muslim
I believe Jesus was a Muslim. He worshiped one God, prayed with his face to the ground, fasted, and submitted to God's will, and the Qur'an says his disciples called themselves Muslims. Muslims follow Jesus more faithfully than Christians do.
What the evidence shows
If “Muslim” means one who submits to God, Christians agree that Jesus submitted to God completely. If it means a follower of the religion the Qur’an teaches, the claim is really that Jesus taught what the Qur’an later taught about him, and that can be tested. The earliest records show a first-century Jew who spoke of himself, his coming death, and God in ways the Qur’an denies. The remaining question is whose account of him is closest to the earliest evidence.
On this page
- Why it seems true
- The answer depends on which meaning of "Muslim" you intend
- Historically, Jesus was a Jew of the first century
- The details that make Jesus look Muslim come from the Gospels
- Where the earliest record and the Qur'an differ
- His disciples are the earliest witnesses to what he taught
- Questions you might still have
- Where this leaves us
- Check the sources
Why it seems true
Islam does not see itself as a new religion. It sees itself as the one religion of every prophet: islam, submission to the one God. The Qur’an says Abraham “was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was one inclining toward truth, a Muslim [submitting to Allāh]” (3:67). When Jesus asked who would support him, his disciples answered, “We have believed in Allāh and testify that we are Muslims [submitting to Him]” (3:52). And the Gospels themselves show Jesus doing what Muslims do. He “fell facedown and prayed” (Matthew 26:39), fasted, rose before dawn to pray, taught that “the Lord our God, the Lord is One,” and prayed, “not as I will, but as You will.” Many Christians today do not prostrate, fast, or keep the dietary laws Jesus kept. Set side by side, a devout Muslim can look more like Jesus than a modern Christian does.
Much of this is right. Jesus prayed, fasted, worshiped the one God, and submitted his will to God’s; Christians believe he did so perfectly. He prostrated in prayer. He kept the Torah, and his mother was honored. Many Christians do not realize how Jewish Jesus was, or how different their own practice is from his. You are right to point that out. The claim also holds two questions: what “Muslim” means when it is applied to Jesus, and whether the evidence shows that Jesus taught what Islam later taught about him.
The answer depends on which meaning of "Muslim" you intend
In Arabic, a muslim is one who submits. In that sense, Christians can say without hesitation that Jesus submitted to God. On the night before his death he prayed, “Abba, Father… Take this cup from Me. Yet not what I will, but what You will” (Mark 14:36). No one in the Christian tradition doubts that Jesus obeyed God.
In that sense, though, the word does not tell you what Jesus taught. A Jew who submits to God and a Christian who submits to God could both be called muslim in this sense, while disagreeing about almost everything else.
The other sense is a follower of the religion taught in the Qur’an and practiced by Muhammad, who lived six centuries after Jesus. Islam’s answer to that gap is that the message was always the same: what the Qur’an teaches about God and about Jesus is what Jesus himself taught. That is a historical claim, and it can be checked against the earliest records of what Jesus said and did.
Two meanings of "Muslim"
The word can describe an attitude toward God or membership in a particular faith. The claim depends on which one is meant.
One who submits to God
Jesus prayed, fasted, worshiped the one God, and submitted his will to God’s.
The question it raises
Christians agree with every part of this.
A follower of the Qur'an's teaching
Jesus was a prophet only, was not crucified, and is not the Son of God.
The question it raises
Do the earliest records of Jesus show him teaching this?
The disagreement is not about the word. It is about what Jesus taught concerning himself, his death, and God.
Historically, Jesus was a Jew of the first century
Historians of every faith and none describe Jesus in much the same terms: a Jewish teacher from Galilee who kept the Torah, worshiped in synagogues, went up to Jerusalem for the festivals, and expected God to act soon to set the world right. Bart Ehrman, an agnostic scholar, describes him as a Jewish prophet who expected the end of the age (Did Jesus Exist?).
That corrects Christians and Muslims alike. Jesus did not look like a modern church member, and he did not pray in the form Muslims pray, which was set centuries later. “As was His custom, He entered the synagogue on the Sabbath” (Luke 4:16). He said, “I have not come to abolish the Law or the Prophets… but to fulfill them” (Matthew 5:17). He celebrated Passover with his disciples.
Practices such as prostration and fasting were part of Jewish worship long before Islam, and Islam honors that heritage as the religion of Abraham. So when a Muslim’s prayer resembles Jesus’ prayer, the resemblance points back to the worship of Israel’s God that both inherit. It does not tell you what Jesus taught about himself.
The details that make Jesus look Muslim come from the Gospels
Almost everything specific we know about Jesus’ prayer, fasting, and habits comes from the four Gospels. The Qur’an tells us that Jesus was a messenger with clear signs, but very little about his daily practice.
If the Gospels are trustworthy when they say Jesus “fell facedown and prayed,” they deserve a hearing when the same Gospels, often in the same chapter, say other things. In that same prayer he calls God “My Father.” At the meal before it he said of the bread, “this is My body,” and of the cup, “This is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many” (Mark 14:22-24). Earlier he had told his disciples “that the Son of Man must suffer many things… and that He must be killed and after three days rise again” (Mark 8:31).
It would be inconsistent to accept the Gospels where they agree with the Qur’an and reject them where they do not, unless there is evidence for the difference. Without such evidence, the choice is being made by the later source, not by the history.
Where the earliest record and the Qur'an differ
The Qur’an and the Gospels agree on a great deal about Jesus. Both say he was born of the virgin Mary, called the Messiah, worked miracles, and taught Israel to worship the one God. Christians are glad of that common ground.
They differ at three decisive points.
- His death. The earliest records show Jesus expecting and accepting his death, and his followers proclaiming it from the start. The Qur’an says he was not crucified. The evidence is set out in Jesus was not crucified.
- His identity. In the earliest Gospel, Jesus forgives sins in his own name and is condemned for claiming God’s throne. The Qur’an calls him a messenger only. See Jesus never claimed to be God.
- The meaning of his death. In Mark’s Gospel, Jesus says he came “to give His life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). His followers made his death and resurrection the heart of their message. In the Qur’an, his death has no such role.
These differences concern what Jesus taught and what his followers proclaimed, not diet or prayer posture.
His disciples are the earliest witnesses to what he taught
The Qur’an honors Jesus’ disciples. It says they declared, “bear witness that indeed we are Muslims” (5:111), and that God would make “those who follow you… superior to those who disbelieve until the Day of Resurrection” (3:55). So it is worth asking what those disciples actually taught.
The earliest evidence comes from Paul, who in the AD 30s spent fifteen days with Peter and met James, Jesus’ brother (Galatians 1:18-19). He records that Peter, James, and John, “those reputed to be pillars,” accepted his message (Galatians 2:9), and he says of them and himself: “Whether, then, it was I or they, this is what we preach” (1 Corinthians 15:11). What they preached was that Jesus died, was buried, and was raised (1 Corinthians 15:3-8).
You may answer that the disciples’ message was later distorted, and that view deserves a hearing; it is looked at in the Bible is corrupted. But on the evidence we have, the men the Qur’an calls Muslims are recorded, within two decades of Jesus’ death, proclaiming the crucifixion and resurrection that the Qur’an denies.
We are supporters for Allāh. We have believed in Allāh and testify that we are Muslims [submitting to Him].
Questions you might still have
Muslim just means one who submits to God. Why object?
Christians do not object to that meaning. In that sense, Jesus submitted to God more fully than anyone. The difficulty comes when the word slides from its first meaning to its second: from “Jesus submitted to God” to “Jesus taught what the Qur’an teaches.” The first is common ground. The second is a claim about what Jesus said, and it has to be weighed against the earliest records of what he said.
Wasn't Jesus sent only to the Children of Israel?
The Qur’an calls him “a messenger to the Children of Israel” (3:49), and in Matthew’s Gospel Jesus says, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 15:24). His ministry during his life was to his own people, and Christians agree. The same records say that after his resurrection he sent his followers to all nations, and history shows that within twenty years his Jewish followers were taking the message to non-Jews across the Roman world.
Don't Christians follow Paul rather than Jesus?
It is a common view, and Paul did shape Christian teaching a great deal. But Paul was not working alone. By his own account, which his opponents could have contradicted, he met Peter and James in Jerusalem, and they recognized his message as the same as theirs. The summary of belief he passes on, that Christ died, was buried, and was raised, is one he says he received from those before him. The Gospels, written by others, tell the same story of Jesus’ death and resurrection.
If Jesus was not a Muslim, was he a Christian?
Not in the sense of belonging to a later church. He was a first-century Jew, and Christians should say so plainly. Christians do not claim Jesus as a member of their religion; they claim that their religion is about him, and that it began with what he taught and what his followers saw. Both faiths face the same question: which account of Jesus is faithful to the earliest evidence about him?
Where this leaves us
If “Muslim” means one who submits to God, Jesus was one, and Christians agree. If it means one who taught what the Qur’an teaches about him, the evidence points another way. The earliest records show a first-century Jew who kept the Torah, spoke of God as his Father, foretold his own death, and was proclaimed crucified and risen by the disciples the Qur’an honors. That does not show the Christian account of Jesus is true. The question it leaves is what Jesus said about himself.
Keep reading
- The crucifixion of JesusPaul's early sources, the movement's beginnings in Jerusalem, hostile Roman and Jewish writers, and the embarrassment of a crucified Messiah all point to a real execution under Pilate.
- The apostolic gospel is finalPaul and Jude describe the apostles' message as a trust to guard. So any later revelation can be tested by one question: does it preach the same gospel?
- Jesus was not crucifiedJesus' crucifixion is recorded within years by his followers and later by hostile Roman and Jewish writers; no historical record before the Qur'an says otherwise.
- Jesus never claimed to be GodThe earliest records show Jesus claiming God's own authority, and his followers worshiping him within decades, long before the Council of Nicaea.
- The Bible is corruptedThe manuscripts differ in small ways, but the Gospel Christians held in Muhammad's day, which the Qur'an tells them to judge by, survives and can be read today.
- The Trinity is shirkThe Trinity is not three gods, but that is not the heart of the charge. The question is whether persons within the one God fit his oneness, and who Jesus is.
Check the sources
This page relies on these sources. Each has its own page with the full citation and, where one exists, a link to the original.